Australia vs Slovakia: Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use
Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use over time
- Australia
- Slovakia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 128,677 t against 45,998 t in Slovakia, a difference of 82,679 t.
That makes Australia's figure about 2.8 times Slovakia's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 7th and Slovakia ranks 10th of 48 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 110,721 t | 0 t | 110,721 t | Australia |
| 2010s | 153,794 t | 57,862 t | 95,931 t | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use, Australia or Slovakia?
- Australia, at 128,677 t against 45,998 t in Slovakia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use between Australia and Slovakia?
- 82,679 t, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Slovakia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2017.
- How do Australia and Slovakia rank globally for urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use?
- Australia ranks 7th and Slovakia ranks 10th of 48 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf