Austria vs Sweden: Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use
Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use over time
- Austria
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 2,992 t against 2,778 t in Austria, a difference of 214 t.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 18th and Sweden ranks 17th of 48 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,400 t | 2,513 t | 887 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 2,930 t | 4,022 t | 1,092 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 3,635 t | 2,992 t | 643 t | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use, Austria or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 2,992 t against 2,778 t in Austria as of 2020.
- What is the difference in urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use between Austria and Sweden?
- 214 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Sweden?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2020.
- How do Austria and Sweden rank globally for urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use?
- Austria ranks 18th and Sweden ranks 17th of 48 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf