Cyprus vs Mongolia: Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use
Cyprus
0 t
in 2024
Mongolia
0 t
in 2022
Cyprus rank
36th
Mongolia rank
36th
Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use over time
- Cyprus
- Mongolia
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Mongolia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mongolia ahead.
Cyprus ranks 36th and Mongolia ranks 36th of 52 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 792.67 t | 14,070 t | 13,277 t | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0.6667 t | 0 t | 0.6667 t | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use, Cyprus or Mongolia?
- Cyprus, at 0 t against 0 t in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use between Cyprus and Mongolia?
- 0 t, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Cyprus and Mongolia rank globally for urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use?
- Cyprus ranks 36th and Mongolia ranks 36th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf