Ecuador vs Slovenia: Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use
Ecuador
0 t
in 2023
Slovenia
4 t
in 2024
Ecuador rank
34th
Slovenia rank
32nd
Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use over time
- Ecuador
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 4 t against 0 t in Ecuador, a difference of 4 t.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 34th and Slovenia ranks 32nd of 48 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.25 t | 205.75 t | 205.5 t | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 0 t | 33 t | 33 t | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use, Ecuador or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 4 t against 0 t in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use between Ecuador and Slovenia?
- 4 t, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Slovenia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Slovenia rank globally for urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use?
- Ecuador ranks 34th and Slovenia ranks 32nd of 48 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf