Latvia vs Nicaragua: Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use
Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use over time
- Latvia
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 27,938 t against 24,424 t in Latvia, a difference of 3,514 t.
That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 13th and Nicaragua ranks 12th of 48 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4,200 t | 40.5 t | 4,160 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 14,982 t | 25,634 t | 10,652 t | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use, Latvia or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 27,938 t against 24,424 t in Latvia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use between Latvia and Nicaragua?
- 3,514 t, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nicaragua?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2022.
- How do Latvia and Nicaragua rank globally for urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use?
- Latvia ranks 13th and Nicaragua ranks 12th of 48 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf