Mongolia vs Slovenia: Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use
Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use over time
- Mongolia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 4 t against 0 t in Mongolia, a difference of 4 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 34th and Slovenia ranks 32nd of 48 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14,070 t | 18.33 t | 14,051 t | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0 t | 42 t | 42 t | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 0 t | 42 t | 42 t | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use, Mongolia or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 4 t against 0 t in Mongolia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use between Mongolia and Slovenia?
- 4 t, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Slovenia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Mongolia and Slovenia rank globally for urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — agricultural use?
- Mongolia ranks 34th and Slovenia ranks 32nd of 48 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf