Belarus vs Belgium: Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Export quantity
Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Export quantity over time
- Belarus
- Belgium
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 127,638 t against 124,741 t in Belarus, a difference of 2,897 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belgium ahead.
Belarus ranks 9th and Belgium ranks 8th of 61 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Belgium in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 194,258 t | 305,178 t | 110,919 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 314,958 t | 200,444 t | 114,513 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 342,155 t | 174,873 t | 167,282 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — export quantity, Belarus or Belgium?
- Belgium, at 127,638 t against 124,741 t in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — export quantity between Belarus and Belgium?
- 2,897 t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Belgium?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Belgium rank globally for urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — export quantity?
- Belarus ranks 9th and Belgium ranks 8th of 61 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf