Azerbaijan vs Sweden: Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import quantity
Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import quantity over time
- Azerbaijan
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 349 t against 226.82 t in Azerbaijan, a difference of 122.18 t.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.5 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Sweden ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 54th and Sweden ranks 53rd of 127 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.55 t | 1,498 t | 1,488 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 319.71 t | 136.1 t | 183.61 t | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import quantity, Azerbaijan or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 349 t against 226.82 t in Azerbaijan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import quantity between Azerbaijan and Sweden?
- 122.18 t, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Sweden?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Azerbaijan and Sweden rank globally for urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import quantity?
- Azerbaijan ranks 54th and Sweden ranks 53rd of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf