Belarus vs Japan: Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import quantity
Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import quantity over time
- Belarus
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 7.28 t against 6.5 t in Belarus, a difference of 0.78 t.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 100th and Japan ranks 98th of 136 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8,579 t | 11.65 t | 8,567 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 277.52 t | 9.73 t | 267.79 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import quantity, Belarus or Japan?
- Japan, at 7.28 t against 6.5 t in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import quantity between Belarus and Japan?
- 0.78 t, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Japan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Japan rank globally for urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import quantity?
- Belarus ranks 100th and Japan ranks 98th of 136 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf