Chile vs Guyana: Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import quantity
Chile
15,348 t
in 2024
Guyana
14,968 t
in 2024
Chile rank
21st
Guyana rank
22nd
Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import quantity over time
- Chile
- Guyana
How they compare
Chile currently reports 15,348 t against 14,968 t in Guyana, a difference of 380 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 21st and Guyana ranks 22nd of 127 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Guyana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.12 t | 0.06 t | 0.06 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 11,326 t | 9,456 t | 1,870 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 15,285 t | 17,878 t | 2,593 t | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import quantity, Chile or Guyana?
- Chile, at 15,348 t against 14,968 t in Guyana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import quantity between Chile and Guyana?
- 380 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Guyana?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Guyana rank globally for urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import quantity?
- Chile ranks 21st and Guyana ranks 22nd of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf