Ecuador vs Finland: Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import quantity
Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import quantity over time
- Ecuador
- Finland
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 8.73 t against 7.92 t in Finland, a difference of 0.81 t.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Finland ahead.
Ecuador ranks 92nd and Finland ranks 94th of 136 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.02 t | 35 t | 34.98 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 1.44 t | 40.55 t | 39.11 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 9.99 t | 65.06 t | 55.08 t | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import quantity, Ecuador or Finland?
- Ecuador, at 8.73 t against 7.92 t in Finland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import quantity between Ecuador and Finland?
- 0.81 t, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Finland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Finland rank globally for urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import quantity?
- Ecuador ranks 92nd and Finland ranks 94th of 136 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf