Azerbaijan vs Malawi: Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import value
Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import value over time
- Azerbaijan
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 76.1 1000 USD against 72.54 1000 USD in Azerbaijan, a difference of 3.56 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Malawi ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 69th and Malawi ranks 68th of 137 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.03 1000 USD | 2,200 1000 USD | 2,194 1000 USD | Malawi |
| 2020s | 111.26 1000 USD | 46.91 1000 USD | 64.35 1000 USD | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import value, Azerbaijan or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 76.1 1000 USD against 72.54 1000 USD in Azerbaijan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import value between Azerbaijan and Malawi?
- 3.56 1000 USD, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Malawi?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Azerbaijan and Malawi rank globally for urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import value?
- Azerbaijan ranks 69th and Malawi ranks 68th of 137 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf