Bahamas vs Uganda: Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import value
Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import value over time
- Bahamas
- Uganda
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 0.21 1000 USD against 0.11 1000 USD in Uganda, a difference of 0.1 1000 USD.
That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.9 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Uganda ahead.
Bahamas ranks 123rd and Uganda ranks 126th of 128 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.08 1000 USD | 0.55 1000 USD | 0.47 1000 USD | Uganda |
| 2010s | 0.8125 1000 USD | 164.47 1000 USD | 163.66 1000 USD | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import value, Bahamas or Uganda?
- Bahamas, at 0.21 1000 USD against 0.11 1000 USD in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import value between Bahamas and Uganda?
- 0.1 1000 USD, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Uganda?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Bahamas and Uganda rank globally for urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import value?
- Bahamas ranks 123rd and Uganda ranks 126th of 128 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf