Congo vs Peru: Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import value
Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import value over time
- Congo
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 4.38 1000 USD against 3.98 1000 USD in Congo, a difference of 0.4 1000 USD.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Peru ahead.
Congo ranks 109th and Peru ranks 107th of 137 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 12.73 1000 USD | 26.25 1000 USD | 13.52 1000 USD | Peru |
| 2020s | 4.81 1000 USD | 2.5 1000 USD | 2.31 1000 USD | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import value, Congo or Peru?
- Peru, at 4.38 1000 USD against 3.98 1000 USD in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import value between Congo and Peru?
- 0.4 1000 USD, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Peru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Peru rank globally for urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import value?
- Congo ranks 109th and Peru ranks 107th of 137 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf