Japan vs Libya: Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import value
Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import value over time
- Japan
- Libya
How they compare
Japan currently reports 37.09 1000 USD against 33.35 1000 USD in Libya, a difference of 3.74 1000 USD.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Libya ahead.
Japan ranks 83rd and Libya ranks 86th of 137 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 46.46 1000 USD | 26.72 1000 USD | 19.74 1000 USD | Japan |
| 2020s | 34.39 1000 USD | 17.56 1000 USD | 16.83 1000 USD | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import value, Japan or Libya?
- Japan, at 37.09 1000 USD against 33.35 1000 USD in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import value between Japan and Libya?
- 3.74 1000 USD, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Libya?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
- How do Japan and Libya rank globally for urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (uan) — import value?
- Japan ranks 83rd and Libya ranks 86th of 137 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea and ammonium nitrate solutions (UAN) — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf