Armenia vs Chile: Urea — Export quantity

Armenia
65.54 t
in 2024
Chile
120.97 t
in 2024
Armenia rank
111th
Chile rank
108th

Urea — Export quantity over time

  • Armenia
  • Chile
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k200220132024

How they compare

Chile currently reports 120.97 t against 65.54 t in Armenia, a difference of 55.43 t.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.8 times Armenia's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 111th and Chile ranks 108th of 127 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Chile Difference Ahead
2000s 0.07 t 530.02 t 529.95 t Chile
2010s 5 t 1,503 t 1,498 t Chile
2020s 26.99 t 192.7 t 165.71 t Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — export quantity, Armenia or Chile?
Chile, at 120.97 t against 65.54 t in Armenia as of 2024.
What is the difference in urea — export quantity between Armenia and Chile?
55.43 t, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Chile?
8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Armenia and Chile rank globally for urea — export quantity?
Armenia ranks 111th and Chile ranks 108th of 127 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Export quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
158 places, 3,045 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf