Chile vs Uganda: Urea — Export quantity

Chile
120.97 t
in 2024
Uganda
88 t
in 2024
Chile rank
108th
Uganda rank
109th

Urea — Export quantity over time

  • Chile
  • Uganda
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k200220132024

How they compare

Chile currently reports 120.97 t against 88 t in Uganda, a difference of 32.97 t.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.4 times Uganda's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 108th and Uganda ranks 109th of 127 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 1,349 t 112.5 t 1,237 t Chile
2010s 511.29 t 67.44 t 443.85 t Chile
2020s 148.33 t 33.84 t 114.5 t Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — export quantity, Chile or Uganda?
Chile, at 120.97 t against 88 t in Uganda as of 2024.
What is the difference in urea — export quantity between Chile and Uganda?
32.97 t, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uganda?
13 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
How do Chile and Uganda rank globally for urea — export quantity?
Chile ranks 108th and Uganda ranks 109th of 127 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Export quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
158 places, 3,045 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf