China, Hong Kong SAR vs Georgia: Urea — Export quantity
Urea — Export quantity over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Georgia
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 1,322 t against 1,013 t in Georgia, a difference of 309 t.
That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.3 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Georgia ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 82nd and Georgia ranks 85th of 127 countries.
China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 312.66 t | 22.24 t | 290.42 t | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2020s | 1,200 t | 234.55 t | 965.45 t | China, Hong Kong SAR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — export quantity, China, Hong Kong SAR or Georgia?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 1,322 t against 1,013 t in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — export quantity between China, Hong Kong SAR and Georgia?
- 309 t, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Georgia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Georgia rank globally for urea — export quantity?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 82nd and Georgia ranks 85th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf