China, Hong Kong SAR vs Zimbabwe: Urea — Export quantity
Urea — Export quantity over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1,770 t against 1,322 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 448 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 79th of 127 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.12 t | 7,734 t | 7,668 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 141.54 t | 1,603 t | 1,461 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 344.75 t | 1,770 t | 1,425 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — export quantity, China, Hong Kong SAR or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1,770 t against 1,322 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2020.
- What is the difference in urea — export quantity between China, Hong Kong SAR and Zimbabwe?
- 448 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Zimbabwe rank globally for urea — export quantity?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 82nd and Zimbabwe ranks 79th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf