China, mainland vs Lithuania: Urea — Export quantity
Urea — Export quantity over time
- China, mainland
- Lithuania
How they compare
China, mainland currently reports 260,554 t against 219,768 t in Lithuania, a difference of 40,786 t.
That makes China, mainland's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, China, mainland has been ahead every year.
China, mainland ranks 26th and Lithuania ranks 28th of 127 countries.
China, mainland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, mainland | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.87 million t | 83,460 t | 2.79 million t | China, mainland |
| 2010s | 7.31 million t | 261,264 t | 7.05 million t | China, mainland |
| 2020s | 3.61 million t | 279,202 t | 3.34 million t | China, mainland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — export quantity, China, mainland or Lithuania?
- China, mainland, at 260,554 t against 219,768 t in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — export quantity between China, mainland and Lithuania?
- 40,786 t, with China, mainland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Lithuania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do China, mainland and Lithuania rank globally for urea — export quantity?
- China, mainland ranks 26th and Lithuania ranks 28th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf