Costa Rica vs Syrian Arab Republic: Urea — Export quantity
Urea — Export quantity over time
- Costa Rica
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 3,278 t against 2,916 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 362 t.
That makes Syrian Arab Republic's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 70th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 68th of 127 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Syrian Arab Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,667 t | 1,732 t | 934.66 t | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 7,051 t | 31,842 t | 24,790 t | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — export quantity, Costa Rica or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 3,278 t against 2,916 t in Costa Rica as of 2014.
- What is the difference in urea — export quantity between Costa Rica and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 362 t, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Costa Rica and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for urea — export quantity?
- Costa Rica ranks 70th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 68th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Export quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf