Belarus vs South Africa: Urea — Export value
Urea — Export value over time
- Belarus
- South Africa
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 105,339 1000 USD against 40,883 1000 USD in South Africa, a difference of 64,456 1000 USD.
That makes Belarus's figure about 2.6 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 25th and South Africa ranks 24th of 127 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63,623 1000 USD | 9,340 1000 USD | 54,283 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2010s | 109,186 1000 USD | 31,491 1000 USD | 77,694 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2020s | 76,956 1000 USD | 38,449 1000 USD | 38,508 1000 USD | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — export value, Belarus or South Africa?
- Belarus, at 105,339 1000 USD against 40,883 1000 USD in South Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — export value between Belarus and South Africa?
- 64,456 1000 USD, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and South Africa?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and South Africa rank globally for urea — export value?
- Belarus ranks 25th and South Africa ranks 24th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf