Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Peru: Urea — Export value
Urea — Export value over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Peru
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 553.55 1000 USD against 529.87 1000 USD in Peru, a difference of 23.68 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Peru ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 86th and Peru ranks 87th of 127 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,007 1000 USD | 3,276 1000 USD | 731.33 1000 USD | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 524.61 1000 USD | 8,083 1000 USD | 7,558 1000 USD | Peru |
| 2020s | 295.16 1000 USD | 3,840 1000 USD | 3,545 1000 USD | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — export value, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Peru?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 553.55 1000 USD against 529.87 1000 USD in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — export value between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Peru?
- 23.68 1000 USD, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Peru?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Peru rank globally for urea — export value?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 86th and Peru ranks 87th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf