Costa Rica vs North Macedonia: Urea — Export value
Urea — Export value over time
- Costa Rica
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 1,514 1000 USD against 1,360 1000 USD in North Macedonia, a difference of 154 1000 USD.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 70th and North Macedonia ranks 73rd of 127 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 798.99 1000 USD | 71.16 1000 USD | 727.83 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 1,576 1000 USD | 5.8 1000 USD | 1,570 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 2,006 1000 USD | 879.8 1000 USD | 1,127 1000 USD | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — export value, Costa Rica or North Macedonia?
- Costa Rica, at 1,514 1000 USD against 1,360 1000 USD in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — export value between Costa Rica and North Macedonia?
- 154 1000 USD, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and North Macedonia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and North Macedonia rank globally for urea — export value?
- Costa Rica ranks 70th and North Macedonia ranks 73rd of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf