Eswatini vs Luxembourg: Urea — Export value
Urea — Export value over time
- Eswatini
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 198.87 1000 USD against 133.86 1000 USD in Eswatini, a difference of 65.01 1000 USD.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.5 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 103rd and Luxembourg ranks 100th of 127 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 453.6 1000 USD | 817.41 1000 USD | 363.81 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 9.39 1000 USD | 2,356 1000 USD | 2,347 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 114.64 1000 USD | 8,678 1000 USD | 8,563 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — export value, Eswatini or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 198.87 1000 USD against 133.86 1000 USD in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — export value between Eswatini and Luxembourg?
- 65.01 1000 USD, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Luxembourg?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Luxembourg rank globally for urea — export value?
- Eswatini ranks 103rd and Luxembourg ranks 100th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf