Finland vs North Macedonia: Urea — Export value
Urea — Export value over time
- Finland
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 1,360 1000 USD against 1,145 1000 USD in Finland, a difference of 215 1000 USD.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.2 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 76th and North Macedonia ranks 73rd of 127 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.12 1000 USD | 71.16 1000 USD | 56.04 1000 USD | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 2,103 1000 USD | 5.8 1000 USD | 2,097 1000 USD | Finland |
| 2020s | 2,344 1000 USD | 879.8 1000 USD | 1,464 1000 USD | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — export value, Finland or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 1,360 1000 USD against 1,145 1000 USD in Finland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — export value between Finland and North Macedonia?
- 215 1000 USD, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and North Macedonia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Finland and North Macedonia rank globally for urea — export value?
- Finland ranks 76th and North Macedonia ranks 73rd of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf