Kyrgyzstan vs Philippines: Urea — Export value
Urea — Export value over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 34.55 1000 USD against 3.8 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 30.75 1000 USD.
That makes Philippines's figure about 9.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Philippines ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 116th and Philippines ranks 113th of 127 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.19 1000 USD | 6,854 1000 USD | 6,847 1000 USD | Philippines |
| 2010s | 1,202 1000 USD | 0.2 1000 USD | 1,202 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 3.8 1000 USD | 0.05 1000 USD | 3.75 1000 USD | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — export value, Kyrgyzstan or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 34.55 1000 USD against 3.8 1000 USD in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — export value between Kyrgyzstan and Philippines?
- 30.75 1000 USD, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Philippines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Philippines rank globally for urea — export value?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 116th and Philippines ranks 113th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf