Lithuania vs South Africa: Urea — Export value
Urea — Export value over time
- Lithuania
- South Africa
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 63,754 1000 USD against 40,883 1000 USD in South Africa, a difference of 22,871 1000 USD.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.6 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 26th and South Africa ranks 29th of 119 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19,138 1000 USD | 9,340 1000 USD | 9,798 1000 USD | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 78,055 1000 USD | 31,491 1000 USD | 46,563 1000 USD | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 101,371 1000 USD | 38,449 1000 USD | 62,923 1000 USD | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — export value, Lithuania or South Africa?
- Lithuania, at 63,754 1000 USD against 40,883 1000 USD in South Africa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — export value between Lithuania and South Africa?
- 22,871 1000 USD, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and South Africa?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and South Africa rank globally for urea — export value?
- Lithuania ranks 26th and South Africa ranks 29th of 119 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf