Luxembourg vs Malawi: Urea — Export value
Urea — Export value over time
- Luxembourg
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 245.08 1000 USD against 198.87 1000 USD in Luxembourg, a difference of 46.21 1000 USD.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Malawi ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 100th and Malawi ranks 97th of 127 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 166.87 1000 USD | 296.56 1000 USD | 129.69 1000 USD | Malawi |
| 2010s | 2,119 1000 USD | 2,109 1000 USD | 10.29 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 4,810 1000 USD | 879.36 1000 USD | 3,931 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — export value, Luxembourg or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 245.08 1000 USD against 198.87 1000 USD in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — export value between Luxembourg and Malawi?
- 46.21 1000 USD, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Malawi?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and Malawi rank globally for urea — export value?
- Luxembourg ranks 100th and Malawi ranks 97th of 127 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Export value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf