Armenia vs Cyprus: Urea — Import quantity

Armenia
3,781 t
in 2024
Cyprus
3,771 t
in 2024
Armenia rank
126th
Cyprus rank
127th

Urea — Import quantity over time

  • Armenia
  • Cyprus
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k200220132024

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 3,781 t against 3,771 t in Cyprus, a difference of 10 t.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Cyprus ahead.

Armenia ranks 126th and Cyprus ranks 127th of 200 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Cyprus in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Cyprus Difference Ahead
2000s 608.75 t 2,545 t 1,936 t Cyprus
2010s 2,575 t 3,390 t 815.15 t Cyprus
2020s 5,726 t 4,351 t 1,376 t Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — import quantity, Armenia or Cyprus?
Armenia, at 3,781 t against 3,771 t in Cyprus as of 2024.
What is the difference in urea — import quantity between Armenia and Cyprus?
10 t, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Cyprus?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Armenia and Cyprus rank globally for urea — import quantity?
Armenia ranks 126th and Cyprus ranks 127th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 4,853 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf