Belgium vs Republic of Korea: Urea — Import quantity
Urea — Import quantity over time
- Belgium
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 737,604 t against 617,860 t in Belgium, a difference of 119,744 t.
That makes Republic of Korea's figure about 1.2 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Belgium ranks 19th and Republic of Korea ranks 17th of 185 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 438,493 t | 691,201 t | 252,708 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 422,305 t | 724,328 t | 302,022 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2020s | 640,090 t | 810,448 t | 170,358 t | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import quantity, Belgium or Republic of Korea?
- Republic of Korea, at 737,604 t against 617,860 t in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import quantity between Belgium and Republic of Korea?
- 119,744 t, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Republic of Korea?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Republic of Korea rank globally for urea — import quantity?
- Belgium ranks 19th and Republic of Korea ranks 17th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf