Botswana vs Russian Federation: Urea — Import quantity
Urea — Import quantity over time
- Botswana
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 1,235 t against 1,017 t in Russian Federation, a difference of 218 t.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Russian Federation's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Botswana ranks 141st and Russian Federation ranks 143rd of 200 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 358.91 t | 543.4 t | 184.49 t | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 519.1 t | 9,879 t | 9,360 t | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 1,740 t | 4,035 t | 2,295 t | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import quantity, Botswana or Russian Federation?
- Botswana, at 1,235 t against 1,017 t in Russian Federation as of 2023.
- What is the difference in urea — import quantity between Botswana and Russian Federation?
- 218 t, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Russian Federation?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Russian Federation rank globally for urea — import quantity?
- Botswana ranks 141st and Russian Federation ranks 143rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf