Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Urea — Import quantity
Urea — Import quantity over time
- Burkina Faso
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 72,996 t against 69,532 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 3,464 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 74th and Zimbabwe ranks 72nd of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28,504 t | 24,005 t | 4,499 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 58,821 t | 50,573 t | 8,248 t | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | 57,734 t | 88,267 t | 30,534 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import quantity, Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 72,996 t against 69,532 t in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
- What is the difference in urea — import quantity between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
- 3,464 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe rank globally for urea — import quantity?
- Burkina Faso ranks 74th and Zimbabwe ranks 72nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf