Cuba vs Mongolia: Urea — Import quantity

Cuba
2,682 t
in 2024
Mongolia
3,367 t
in 2023
Cuba rank
135th
Mongolia rank
132nd

Urea — Import quantity over time

  • Cuba
  • Mongolia
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k200220132024

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 3,367 t against 2,682 t in Cuba, a difference of 685 t.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.3 times Cuba's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 135th and Mongolia ranks 132nd of 200 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Mongolia Difference Ahead
2000s 39,558 t 275.36 t 39,282 t Cuba
2010s 68,991 t 655.03 t 68,336 t Cuba
2020s 12,003 t 2,266 t 9,737 t Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — import quantity, Cuba or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 3,367 t against 2,682 t in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in urea — import quantity between Cuba and Mongolia?
685 t, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Mongolia?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Mongolia rank globally for urea — import quantity?
Cuba ranks 135th and Mongolia ranks 132nd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 4,853 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf