Denmark vs Namibia: Urea — Import quantity

Denmark
78,985 t
in 2024
Namibia
79,673 t
in 2024
Denmark rank
69th
Namibia rank
66th

Urea — Import quantity over time

  • Denmark
  • Namibia
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k200220132024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 79,673 t against 78,985 t in Denmark, a difference of 688 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 69th and Namibia ranks 66th of 200 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 43,663 t 1,192 t 42,471 t Denmark
2010s 56,276 t 769.01 t 55,507 t Denmark
2020s 82,824 t 16,163 t 66,662 t Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — import quantity, Denmark or Namibia?
Namibia, at 79,673 t against 78,985 t in Denmark as of 2024.
What is the difference in urea — import quantity between Denmark and Namibia?
688 t, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Namibia?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Denmark and Namibia rank globally for urea — import quantity?
Denmark ranks 69th and Namibia ranks 66th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 4,853 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf