Dominica vs Sao Tome and Principe: Urea — Import quantity
Urea — Import quantity over time
- Dominica
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 11.6 t against 11.32 t in Dominica, a difference of 0.28 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Dominica ranks 171st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 170th of 185 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.73 t | 29.36 t | 23.63 t | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 15.9 t | 26.61 t | 10.72 t | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2020s | 14.04 t | 27.27 t | 13.23 t | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import quantity, Dominica or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 11.6 t against 11.32 t in Dominica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in urea — import quantity between Dominica and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.28 t, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for urea — import quantity?
- Dominica ranks 171st and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 170th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf