Equatorial Guinea vs Lesotho: Urea — Import quantity
Urea — Import quantity over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 72.72 t against 49.48 t in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 23.24 t.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.5 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Lesotho ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 173rd and Lesotho ranks 170th of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.65 t | 80.89 t | 57.23 t | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 80.79 t | 226.4 t | 145.61 t | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 27.27 t | 16.28 t | 10.99 t | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import quantity, Equatorial Guinea or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 72.72 t against 49.48 t in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import quantity between Equatorial Guinea and Lesotho?
- 23.24 t, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Lesotho?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Lesotho rank globally for urea — import quantity?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 173rd and Lesotho ranks 170th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf