Equatorial Guinea vs Maldives: Urea — Import quantity
Urea — Import quantity over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Maldives
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 49.48 t against 45.73 t in Maldives, a difference of 3.75 t.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 173rd and Maldives ranks 174th of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Maldives in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.72 t | 19.86 t | 1.86 t | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 80.79 t | 21.13 t | 59.66 t | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 27.27 t | 46.37 t | 19.1 t | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import quantity, Equatorial Guinea or Maldives?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 49.48 t against 45.73 t in Maldives as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import quantity between Equatorial Guinea and Maldives?
- 3.75 t, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Maldives?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Maldives rank globally for urea — import quantity?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 173rd and Maldives ranks 174th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf