Kyrgyzstan vs Papua New Guinea: Urea — Import quantity
Urea — Import quantity over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 32,738 t against 31,031 t in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1,707 t.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 92nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 91st of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 10,582 t | 4,648 t | 5,933 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 33,780 t | 15,797 t | 17,983 t | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 32,226 t | 33,824 t | 1,598 t | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import quantity, Kyrgyzstan or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 32,738 t against 31,031 t in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import quantity between Kyrgyzstan and Papua New Guinea?
- 1,707 t, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Papua New Guinea?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for urea — import quantity?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 92nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 91st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf