Latvia vs Mali: Urea — Import quantity

Latvia
36,745 t
in 2024
Mali
51,486 t
in 2024
Latvia rank
86th
Mali rank
83rd

Urea — Import quantity over time

  • Latvia
  • Mali
0100.0k200.0k300.0k200220132024

How they compare

Mali currently reports 51,486 t against 36,745 t in Latvia, a difference of 14,741 t.

That makes Mali's figure about 1.4 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Mali ahead.

Latvia ranks 86th and Mali ranks 83rd of 200 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Mali Difference Ahead
2000s 10,885 t 65,775 t 54,889 t Mali
2010s 42,132 t 189,198 t 147,066 t Mali
2020s 56,634 t 39,046 t 17,589 t Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher urea — import quantity, Latvia or Mali?
Mali, at 51,486 t against 36,745 t in Latvia as of 2024.
What is the difference in urea — import quantity between Latvia and Mali?
14,741 t, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mali?
19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Latvia and Mali rank globally for urea — import quantity?
Latvia ranks 86th and Mali ranks 83rd of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Urea — Import quantity
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
232 places, 4,853 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf