Marshall Islands vs Timor-Leste: Urea — Import quantity
Urea — Import quantity over time
- Marshall Islands
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 254.12 t against 172.33 t in Marshall Islands, a difference of 81.79 t.
That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.5 times Marshall Islands's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 161st and Timor-Leste ranks 158th of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Marshall Islands averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 t | 71.56 t | 70.56 t | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 32 t | 147.05 t | 115.05 t | Timor-Leste |
| 2020s | 685.75 t | 187.23 t | 498.52 t | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import quantity, Marshall Islands or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 254.12 t against 172.33 t in Marshall Islands as of 2023.
- What is the difference in urea — import quantity between Marshall Islands and Timor-Leste?
- 81.79 t, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Timor-Leste?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
- How do Marshall Islands and Timor-Leste rank globally for urea — import quantity?
- Marshall Islands ranks 161st and Timor-Leste ranks 158th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf