Panama vs Republic of Moldova: Urea — Import quantity
Urea — Import quantity over time
- Panama
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 36,275 t against 33,640 t in Panama, a difference of 2,635 t.
That makes Republic of Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 90th and Republic of Moldova ranks 88th of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Moldova in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23,728 t | 1,078 t | 22,650 t | Panama |
| 2010s | 24,993 t | 28,375 t | 3,382 t | Republic of Moldova |
| 2020s | 34,023 t | 41,318 t | 7,295 t | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import quantity, Panama or Republic of Moldova?
- Republic of Moldova, at 36,275 t against 33,640 t in Panama as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import quantity between Panama and Republic of Moldova?
- 2,635 t, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Republic of Moldova?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Panama and Republic of Moldova rank globally for urea — import quantity?
- Panama ranks 90th and Republic of Moldova ranks 88th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import quantity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf