Afghanistan vs Côte d'Ivoire: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Afghanistan
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 62,000 1000 USD against 61,814 1000 USD in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 186 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 55th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 56th of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Côte d'Ivoire in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 407.09 1000 USD | 13,564 1000 USD | 13,156 1000 USD | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 39,912 1000 USD | 22,239 1000 USD | 17,673 1000 USD | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 39,616 1000 USD | 58,219 1000 USD | 18,603 1000 USD | Côte d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Afghanistan or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Afghanistan, at 62,000 1000 USD against 61,814 1000 USD in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Afghanistan and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 186 1000 USD, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for urea — import value?
- Afghanistan ranks 55th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 56th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf