Afghanistan vs Mozambique: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Afghanistan
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 64,269 1000 USD against 62,000 1000 USD in Afghanistan, a difference of 2,269 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Mozambique ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 54th and Mozambique ranks 52nd of 187 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 407.09 1000 USD | 6,401 1000 USD | 5,994 1000 USD | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 39,912 1000 USD | 14,457 1000 USD | 25,455 1000 USD | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 39,616 1000 USD | 38,916 1000 USD | 700.56 1000 USD | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Afghanistan or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 64,269 1000 USD against 62,000 1000 USD in Afghanistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Afghanistan and Mozambique?
- 2,269 1000 USD, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Mozambique?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Afghanistan and Mozambique rank globally for urea — import value?
- Afghanistan ranks 54th and Mozambique ranks 52nd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf