Angola vs North Macedonia: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Angola
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 8,366 1000 USD against 7,298 1000 USD in Angola, a difference of 1,068 1000 USD.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Angola ranks 105th and North Macedonia ranks 103rd of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,752 1000 USD | 2,073 1000 USD | 321.19 1000 USD | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 6,870 1000 USD | 3,729 1000 USD | 3,141 1000 USD | Angola |
| 2020s | 9,680 1000 USD | 7,993 1000 USD | 1,688 1000 USD | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Angola or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 8,366 1000 USD against 7,298 1000 USD in Angola as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Angola and North Macedonia?
- 1,068 1000 USD, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and North Macedonia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Angola and North Macedonia rank globally for urea — import value?
- Angola ranks 105th and North Macedonia ranks 103rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf