Barbados vs Turkmenistan: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Barbados
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 57.16 1000 USD against 52.65 1000 USD in Turkmenistan, a difference of 4.51 1000 USD.
That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Barbados ranks 168th and Turkmenistan ranks 170th of 200 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Turkmenistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 371.93 1000 USD | 2,428 1000 USD | 2,056 1000 USD | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 301.71 1000 USD | 6,831 1000 USD | 6,530 1000 USD | Turkmenistan |
| 2020s | 41.17 1000 USD | 30.39 1000 USD | 10.78 1000 USD | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Barbados or Turkmenistan?
- Barbados, at 57.16 1000 USD against 52.65 1000 USD in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Barbados and Turkmenistan?
- 4.51 1000 USD, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Turkmenistan?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Turkmenistan rank globally for urea — import value?
- Barbados ranks 168th and Turkmenistan ranks 170th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf