Belarus vs Marshall Islands: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Belarus
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 139.79 1000 USD against 67.35 1000 USD in Marshall Islands, a difference of 72.44 1000 USD.
That makes Belarus's figure about 2.1 times Marshall Islands's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 150th and Marshall Islands ranks 153rd of 187 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.4 1000 USD | 0.3 1000 USD | 40.1 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2010s | 10,345 1000 USD | 24.35 1000 USD | 10,320 1000 USD | Belarus |
| 2020s | 2,183 1000 USD | 213.16 1000 USD | 1,970 1000 USD | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Belarus or Marshall Islands?
- Belarus, at 139.79 1000 USD against 67.35 1000 USD in Marshall Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Belarus and Marshall Islands?
- 72.44 1000 USD, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Marshall Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Marshall Islands rank globally for urea — import value?
- Belarus ranks 150th and Marshall Islands ranks 153rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf