Belgium vs Côte d'Ivoire: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Belgium
- Côte d'Ivoire
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 168,746 1000 USD against 61,814 1000 USD in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 106,932 1000 USD.
That makes Belgium's figure about 2.7 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 25th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 27th of 187 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Côte d'Ivoire | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 112,700 1000 USD | 15,703 1000 USD | 96,997 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2010s | 141,023 1000 USD | 21,341 1000 USD | 119,682 1000 USD | Belgium |
| 2020s | 257,357 1000 USD | 58,219 1000 USD | 199,137 1000 USD | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Belgium or Côte d'Ivoire?
- Belgium, at 168,746 1000 USD against 61,814 1000 USD in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Belgium and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 106,932 1000 USD, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Côte d'Ivoire?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for urea — import value?
- Belgium ranks 25th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 27th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf