Bhutan vs Equatorial Guinea: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Bhutan
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 33.88 1000 USD against 28.62 1000 USD in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 5.26 1000 USD.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 174th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 175th of 200 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 366.74 1000 USD | 13.46 1000 USD | 353.28 1000 USD | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 212.92 1000 USD | 33.63 1000 USD | 179.29 1000 USD | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 52.47 1000 USD | 31.5 1000 USD | 20.97 1000 USD | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Bhutan or Equatorial Guinea?
- Bhutan, at 33.88 1000 USD against 28.62 1000 USD in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea?
- 5.26 1000 USD, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for urea — import value?
- Bhutan ranks 174th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 175th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf