Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: Urea — Import value
Urea — Import value over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Ecuador
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 9,855 1000 USD against 9,546 1000 USD in Ecuador, a difference of 309 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Ecuador ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 90th and Ecuador ranks 91st of 185 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,924 1000 USD | 64,679 1000 USD | 59,755 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 7,138 1000 USD | 106,979 1000 USD | 99,841 1000 USD | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 9,558 1000 USD | 40,367 1000 USD | 30,809 1000 USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher urea — import value, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Ecuador?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 9,855 1000 USD against 9,546 1000 USD in Ecuador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in urea — import value between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador?
- 309 1000 USD, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador rank globally for urea — import value?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 90th and Ecuador ranks 91st of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Urea — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf